Akeyless Injector Vs External Secrets Operator

The following is a comparison between the External Secrets Operator and the Akeyless Injector. Both solutions manage secrets in Kubernetes, but they differ in approach, storage, and security model.

Akeyless K8s Secrets Injector

A solution that injects secrets into pods at runtime without storing them in Kubernetes secrets. Containers within the pod can consume those secrets without interacting with Akeyless. The injector is a Kubernetes

MutatingAdmissionWebhook controller that modifies annotated pods, delivering secrets as environment variables or files via an init container. Updates can be handled automatically using rollout restart.

External Secrets Operator (ESO)

An open-source Kubernetes operator that integrates external secret managers like Akeyless. It fetches secrets via external APIs, converts them into Kubernetes Secrets, and stores them securely in the cluster storage. Automatic secret refresh is supported without changing the application, also pushing secrets back to Akeyless is supported.

Akeyless Injector vs. External Secrets Operator

The following table compares key aspects of the Akeyless Kubernetes Injector and the External Secrets Operator (ESO), focusing on how each solution handles secret management within Kubernetes environments.

FeatureAkeyless InjectorExternal Secrets Operator
Secret TypesStatic
Rotated
Dynamic
Certificates
USC
Static
Rotated
Dynamic
Certificates
Authentication MethodsK8s
API Key
Azure AD
AWS_IAM
GCP
K8s
API Key
Azure AD
AWS_IAM
GCP
How secrets are fetchedSecrets are injected into pods at runtime, and each pod requests the relevant secret it needs Secrets are synced from external systems into K8s Secret resources using a dedicated external secret resource per secret. All requests are done via the controller
Access ControlAccess control is done via Akeyless RBAC, where different claims can be used to control the RBAC itself.Access control is done on Akeyless and on K8s itself, as it creates K8s secrets. In addition, due to the architecture of a single requestor, only the SA reference can be used in addition to limit access via Akeyless RBAC.
Secret lifetimeThe secret exists only while the pod is runningSecret stays in the cluster until it’s manually deleted
K8s Integration typeSeamless as K8s admission controllerUses a controller that interacts with K8s secret
Secret storage locationThe secrets are injected directly into the pod. Can be saved in a specific location with custom file permissionsSecrets are stored as Kubernetes Secrets
Secret Automatic RefreshSupport of rollout restart upon any change of a secret, without periodic checks Periodic checks for secret changes (many requests) without auto detection.
CacheBypass cache is supported to fetch the latest secret value. This can be controlled globally for all deployments, to fetch the secret latest value, Can be controlled globally for all deployments, or explicitly.Not supported, in case the Gateway cache is used, first it will provide a cached version when it exists
Observability and MonitoringAll secret accesses are logged in the Akeyless audit logs, recording who accessed what, when, and from where, as well as telemetry metrics availableAll secrets access are logged in the Akelyess audit logs. ESO sends out K8s events when it syncs secrets, runs into errors while fetching them, or updates the status of an ExternalSecret.
DeploymentDeployed via a Helm chart. Supporting global settings in addition to the settings each deployment can be set with via annotations.Deployed via a Helm chart.
Uses K8s resources like ExternalSecret, SecretStore, etc, to manage and settings.

Conclusion

Kubernetes is not a secrets management solution. It does support native secrets storage, but those are not encrypted. It does come with a built-in RBAC model, but this is not easy to manage at scale and does not provide the same level of fine-grained policy control as Akeyless. Once a Kubernetes secrets are defined, they are stored in the Kubernetes storage server and presented to pods only during pod creation. meaning it is a common issue where secrets are being stale, outdated, or expired, requiring additional workflows to update and rotate the secrets, and then re-deploy the application to use the new version of the secrets.


Footer Section